How Good Is Windows Defender in 2025? We Put It to the Test




BuggyByte


Let’s cut to the chase  is Windows Defender actually good in 2025? We decided to find out the messy way: by throwing over 2,000 brand-new malware samples straight from the wilds of the internet at it. These aren't the kind of viruses you'd find in an antivirus lab. These are raw, unfiltered threats  the kind that are floating around forums, sketchy links, and shady downloads.

No gimmicks. Just a Windows system with the latest updates and Defender running. No third-party antivirus. No fancy sandbox. Just us, our automation script, and a folder full of digital chaos.

Windows Defender Comes Out Swinging

At the beginning, Windows Defender actually did a solid job. It detected and blocked 100% of the malware samples we started with. If the test ended there, it would’ve been pretty boring.

But of course, it didn’t.

Things Start to Fall Apart

About 20% into the test, stuff started going sideways. We noticed some sketchy activity happening in the background a suspicious download kicked off from System32 (never a good sign) and then came the real troublemaker: a piece of malware labeled Unicorn.

Unicorn hijacked the screen and wouldn’t let go. Task Manager couldn’t kill it. The system froze. The detection rate dropped to around 92%, and at that point, Defender was starting to miss threats left and right. A hard reset was the only way to get the system usable again.

Even after rebooting, the mess was still there. Dozens of malware files were running. One particularly nasty file had 56 hits on VirusTotal, which means it’s well-known  and yet, it still managed to slip through and execute.

What Went Wrong?

This is where things get a little worrying. Windows Defender did have signatures for the malware it recognized the threats after the fact  but still let them run. That means either real-time protection missed it, or cloud-based detection was too slow to respond.

Bottom line: Defender didn’t stop it in time.

Is It Good Enough?

That depends on who you are.

The Good

Really solid detection rates for brand new malware.
It's built into Windows, free, and lightweight.
For the average person browsing safely and avoiding suspicious downloads, it’s more than enough.

The Bad

Behavioral protection is kind of meh, unless you tweak settings that most people never touch
Cloud based detections can be slow, giving malware just enough time to do damage.
In our test, one malware sample took over the machine and nearly broke the system.

What About Businesses?

If you're running a business or dealing with sensitive info, Defender alone probably isn’t cutting it. You want layers  like application control, behavior monitoring, and ideally a zero trust approach.

We tested ThreatLocker, which is based on a default deny model  basically, nothing runs unless you specifically allow it. Even if we renamed a ransomware file and tried to run it, it was blocked cold. No drama, no guessing. It even alerted us when the ransomware tried to delete backups that’s the kind of security you want when stuff hits the fan.

Look, Windows Defender has come a long way. It’s not the joke it used to be back in the Windows XP days. For most people, it’s totally fine it catches a lot, runs in the background quietly, and doesn’t bug you too much.

But as our test showed, it's not bulletproof. If something brand new and nasty slips through before Microsoft updates their cloud signatures, you're exposed. And if you're running a business or just want more peace of mind, it’s worth looking into additional tools or protection layers.